Caveat lector: This blog is where I try out new ideas. I will often be wrong, but that's the point.

Home | Personal | Entertainment | Professional | Publications | Blog

Search Archive


Voytek Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience paper: "Hemicraniectomy: A new model for human electrophysiology with high spatio-temporal resolution"

(Note: this is a repost of my original post from 2009 Dec. I'm reposting some old posts to work within the ResearchBlogging.org framework.)

Bradley Voytek hemicraniectomy

This paper grew out of an interesting collaboration with some physicians at the University of California, San Francisco and San Francisco General Hospital, initially through a meeting between Dr. Geoffrey Manley, Dr. Robert Knight, and I. Dr. Manley has recently published several papers on the clinical benefits of performing a decompressive hemicraniectomy on people who have had some kind of head trauma. To give a little bit of a background, a decompressive hemicraniectomy is a surgical procedure in which the surgeon actually removes a large part of the skull (see the picture at the right) after someone has had head trauma that has caused the pressure inside the skull to increase. This can happen in a few ways, but basically, because the head is an enclosed system,  if the brain swells arteries can get pressed closed. This can cut off the blood supply to different brain areas. The swelling can also cause the brain to press down onto the brainstem which can lead to coma or death.

These folks go without a big piece of their skull for several months. If you're paying attention, that means... yes... there's not a whole lot protecting their brains. As you could imagine most of them wear helmets during this time. Also, some of them actually have the piece of their own skull surgically placed inside their abdomen so that the skull tissues can be kept alive before the get their skull surgically put back in!

Working with these patients gave us a unique opportunity as cognitive neuroscientists. Most of my research uses EEG to examine attention and memory processes. One of the things about EEG is that you can't accurately locate where in the brain something is happening, but you can know when it happens with excellent accuracy. However, because these patients literally have a window onto the brain we can get a much better idea of where the signal we're recording is coming from. And, for a variety of reasons, the signal quality is better over this window.

Our lab does a lot of work with humans who have had electrodes surgically implanted directly onto their brains (I'll write a more in-depth post about this topic in the near future when one of my papers on this topic is published). Because of this I see a lot of really clean data from the intracranial recordings that looks much better than the data we see in normal scalp EEG. So we decided to try and quantify these differences to a certain extent, and thus ran this study.

So in this paper we set out to quantify how the brain signals we record in EEG are different between the side of the head with the skull and the side of the head without. And because the signal quality is better, we can do a few cool things with it... like predicting when a person squeezes their hand just by looking at the brain signal.

It was a fun project, but a bit tricky to run.

Voytek B, Secundo L, Bidet-Caulet A, Scabini D, Stiver SI, Gean AD, Manley GT, & Knight RT (2010). Hemicraniectomy: a new model for human electrophysiology with high spatio-temporal resolution. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 (11), 2491-2502 PMID: 19925193


  1. wow wow, that's amazing! Will read the paper asap.

    Could you also do optical imaging on the bare brain? E.g. measure the redness of the blood - or the volume of the bloodflow - and correlate that with fMRI measures?

    Except I guess you wouldn't be allowed to do MRI because of the risk of metal fragments from the surgery :(

  2. Thanks! We never thought about doing optical imaging (NIRS, etc.) but we actually were able to collect fMRI data.

    We were hoping to examine the relationship between the BOLD signal and high-frequency EEG activity, but unfortunately the fMRI data was extremely distorted. I'm told by our MR physicist that the boundaries of the skull lead to some strange artifacts, but I'm not an MR person, so I can't really expand on that.